Reshaping of 401(k)s
- James Love

- Jan 2
- 3 min read
Updated: Jan 22
For most of the past few decades, retirement investors had a pretty narrow toolbelt to
choose from within their employer 401(k), 403(b), or TSP accounts: stocks, bonds, and
maybe a target date fund that mixed the two in different proportions. If you wanted
access to hedge funds, private credit, or private equity, you had to be running a pension
plan or sitting on the ultra-high-net-worth side of the fence. Everyday retirement savers?
No way Jose! That may be about to change.
On August 7, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order called “Democratizing
Access to Alternative Assets for 401(k) Investors.” In plain English, Washington is
pushing regulators to rethink how alternatives fit into retirement plans. The Department
of Labor has six months (until February 2026) to deliver updated rules, and their first
step was to scrap a 2021 statement that had essentially warned fiduciaries away from
alternatives. At the same time, the SEC is reevaluating its definition of who counts as a
“qualified” investor, meaning the guardrails that have kept average workers away from
private markets could soon loosen and be open to everyone.
If this plays out, we may start to see 401(k)’s including exposure to hedge funds, private
equity, private credit, and maybe even crypto. This would not be in a do it yourself
format, but packaged inside things like target date funds, interval funds, or collective
trusts. It won’t happen overnight. Even after new rules are finalized, plan providers will
take time to design, approve, and roll out these strategies. And because this is an
executive order (not an act of Congress), the whole process may still be tested in the
courts.
Still, the potential shift is worth paying attention to.
For asset managers, the attraction is obvious, 401(k) plans represent $12 trillion in
stable, long term capital. Even a sliver redirected into alternatives could reshape their
business models. But success will require more than clever products. It will demand
stronger oversight, investor education, and infrastructure built for retail investors.
For retirement savers, the story is about opportunity and caution in equal measure.
Alternatives can bring new tools to the table diversifying beyond the old stock and bond
mix, offering different income streams, and potentially boosting returns. But they also
come with new layers of complexity: less liquidity, less transparency, and widely varying
manager quality and fees.
And here’s where private equity, in particular, gets tricky. Historically, these deals have
been reserved for the wealthiest and most sophisticated investors, the kind of people or
institutions who have the staff, resources, and experience to sift through what’s
worthwhile and what’s not. But even among those investors, plenty of deals get passed
on because they don’t look compelling enough. The concern is that if those same deals
then get “repackaged” into a 401(k) option, less sophisticated investors may end up
owning the leftovers, the private equity opportunities that the big players didn’t want.
That doesn’t mean every deal is bad, but it does raise the question: are retirement
savers getting true opportunity, or simply access to the scraps?
In other words, these tools are powerful but they require careful use, ideally with
guidance from a professional who can help weigh the risks against the potential
rewards.
Bottom line, a door that’s been closed to most retirement savers for decades may soon
crack open. Whether it leads to better outcomes or new headaches will depend on how
carefully both investors and providers step through it.
The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not
intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual or firm.




Comments